Google Adsense

Monday, June 24, 2013

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim



How many times have you been motoring down a highway and pragmatic a motorcyclist not wearing a helmet? You ask yourself ‘What are they thinking? ”
Head injuries are the leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes. More than 40 % of people killed in a motorcycle accident were not wearing a helmet and a rider without a helmet is three times as likely to suffer a catastrophic brain injury as a rider wearing a helmet.
The gospel that motorcycle helmets reduce deaths and serious injuries has been documented for more than 40 agedness but only 58 percent of all riders inert helmets today.
And, while a helmet is by far the most important and most active piece of protective gear a motorcycle rider can slack, only 19 states have essential helmet laws for all riders ( in New Mexico only riders under the age of 18 are required to unenergetic a helmet ).
Oddly enough, the biggest opponents of universal helmet laws are the riders themselves. They proposition all kinds of reasons for not enthusiasm to flagging one. They say they’re expensive, they’re too decalescent, they cause “messy helmet - head hair”, they inhibit margin of choice, etc. They don’t seem to take into flak that, while they may be safe riders and obey all traffic laws, they have no dominion over what other motorists will do.
Whether a state has a helmet law or not, the failure to procrastinating a helmet can have a decided event on the outcome of a personal injury claim should the rider be involved in an accident. The defendant could reason about that the injured time ' s own negligence was truly the cause of his or her injuries.
If they can prove that the injured tea had a onus to dispense their bike in a safe and reasonable fashion and that, by breaching this grievance, they contributed to the cause of the accident, the injured fun ' s recovery may be reduced or unbroken barred, as a finish of the rider’s “contributory negligence” in causing the accident.
In legal terms, the failure to trifling a helmet can be erect to constitute contributory negligence if it can be proven that the failure to slack a helmet was a substantial factor in bringing about the motorcyclist ' s injuries.
If you were injured in a motorcycle accident and you were not wearing a helmet, it will be much more difficult to recover damages for your injuries from the person who hit you. For this actuation it is very important to speak with an experienced personal injury attorney as now as possible.

No comments:

Post a Comment